Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Nijmegenas anketas disfunkcionālās elpošanas novērtēšanai× | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Pulmonoloģija | Pulmonoloģija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1994 | 1999 |
| Autors≠ | van Beveren and colleagues, Netherlands | Elizabeth F. Juniper, McMaster University |
| Tips | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Pirmavots≠ | Van Beveren, T. L., Fülöp, M., van Beek, H. G., & Zijlstra, F. J. (1994). Hyperventilation and panic panic attacks in a group of asthma patients. Respiration, 61(5), 282-287. link ↗ | Juniper, E. F., O'Byrne, P. M., Guyatt, G. H., Ferrie, P. J., & King, D. R. (1999). Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control. European Respiratory Journal, 14(4), 902-907. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | Nijmegen, Nijmegen Questionnaire, DBQ | ACQ, Asthma Control Q |
| Saistītās | 5 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Nijmegen Questionnaire is a 16-item self-report instrument designed to identify dysfunctional breathing patterns, particularly hyperventilation syndrome, in patients presenting with respiratory or non-respiratory symptoms. Developed by van Beveren and colleagues in the Netherlands in 1994, it provides rapid assessment of symptoms attributable to chronic hyperventilation: dizziness, chest tightness, muscle tension, paresthesias, and anxiety. The Nijmegen Questionnaire is widely used in respiratory physiology clinics, pulmonary rehabilitation programs, and psychosomatic medicine to detect dysfunctional breathing phenotypes that may masquerade as asthma, anxiety disorders, or cardiopulmonary disease. | The ACQ is a 7-item self-report questionnaire developed by Juniper and colleagues at McMaster University in 1999 to assess the degree of asthma control in the previous one to two weeks. Unlike generic respiratory tools, the ACQ measures symptom-based control and rescue medication use, providing a simple yet psychometrically sound method for evaluating treatment efficacy. It is widely adopted in clinical trials, guideline-driven care, and routine asthma management to guide therapy titration and assess treatment response. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|