Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Dinamiskā kopienu noteikšana× | Laika tīklu analīze× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Tīklu analīze | Tīklu analīze |
| Saime≠ | Machine learning | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2010 (key formalization); earlier work 2002–2009 | 2012 |
| Autors≠ | Mucha, P. J. et al. (key formalization); earlier work by Girvan & Newman (2002) | Holme & Saramäki (2012) — seminal framework |
| Tips≠ | Graph clustering / community discovery | Dynamic graph analysis |
| Pirmavots≠ | Mucha, P. J., Richardson, T., Macon, K., Porter, M. A., & Onnela, J.-P. (2010). Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks. Science, 328(5980), 876–878. DOI ↗ | Holme, P. & Saramäki, J. (2012). Temporal Networks. Physics Reports, 519(3), 97-125. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | DCD, temporal community detection, evolving community detection, dynamic graph clustering | dynamic network analysis, time-varying network analysis, Zamansal Ağ Analizi (Temporal / Dynamic Networks) |
| Saistītās≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Dynamic community detection identifies groups of densely connected nodes in networks that evolve over time, tracking how communities form, merge, split, and dissolve across temporal snapshots. Developed to extend static modularity optimization to time-varying structures, it is widely used in social, biological, and communication network research. | Temporal network analysis, formalised by Holme and Saramäki in their landmark 2012 Physics Reports survey, is the study of networks in which edges appear and disappear over time. Rather than collapsing all contacts into a single static graph, the approach preserves the precise timing of interactions — whether as contact sequences, time-stamped event lists, or windowed snapshots — and uses that timing to track how influence, disease, or information can actually propagate through the system. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|