Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Dyadic Analysis× | Triad Census× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Sociology | Sociology |
| Saime≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1981 | 1970 |
| Autors≠ | Holland & Leinhardt (p1); Kenny (Social Relations Model) | Paul Holland & Samuel Leinhardt |
| Tips≠ | Analysis of the dyad as the unit, decomposing relational effects | Enumeration of the 16 isomorphism classes of directed triads |
| Pirmavots≠ | Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(373), 33–50. DOI ↗ | Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1970). A method for detecting structure in sociometric data. American Journal of Sociology, 76(3), 492–513. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | dyad analysis, dyadic data analysis, social relations model, dyad census | triad count, triadic census, 16-type triad census, MAN triad census |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Dyadic analysis treats the dyad — the pair of actors and the relation between them — as the unit of analysis, separating the relational outcome into what each actor brings to all their relationships and what is unique to the specific pair. It spans the descriptive dyad census of network analysis and statistical frameworks such as Holland and Leinhardt's p1 model and Kenny's Social Relations Model, all of which respect the structural non-independence inherent in relational data. | The triad census counts how many of a directed network's three-actor subgroups fall into each of the 16 possible types of triad, providing a compact fingerprint of the network's local structure. Introduced by Paul Holland and Samuel Leinhardt in 1970, it is the standard way to test structural theories — balance, clustering, transitivity, ranked clusters — by comparing the observed distribution of triad types against what a random network would produce. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|