ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Divkārt maskēts AB dizains×Viena subjekta eksperimentālais dizains×
NozareEksperimentu plānošanaEksperimentu plānošana
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1960s (AB design); double-blinding integration in single-case clinical research from the 1980s–1990s1960s (Sidman 1960; formal applied codification by Kazdin and Baer in 1970s–1980s)
AutorsDerived from the AB single-subject design tradition (Sidman 1960; Baer, Wolf, & Risley 1968) combined with double-blinding conventions from clinical trial methodologyMurray Sidman (foundational tactics); B. F. Skinner (applied behavior analysis lineage)
TipsSingle-subject experimental design with double-blindingExperimental research design
PirmavotsKazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195030440Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195030440
Citi nosaukumiblinded AB design, double-blind single-case AB, masked AB design, double-blind baseline-intervention designSSED, single-case experimental design, n-of-1 design, intrasubject replication design
Saistītās56
KopsavilkumsThe double-blind AB design is a single-subject experimental approach that sequences a baseline phase (A) and an intervention phase (B) while concealing phase allocation from both the participant and the outcome assessor. It merges the idiographic focus of single-case methodology with the bias-control mechanism of double-blinding, making it especially useful in clinical rehabilitation, pain research, and behavioral medicine when objective measurement of an individual's response to treatment is the primary goal.Single-subject experimental design (SSED) establishes experimental control by repeatedly measuring one individual (or a small number of individuals) across baseline and intervention phases, using the participant as their own control. Instead of comparing groups, it compares the participant's own behavior across conditions over time. Widely used in applied behavior analysis, special education, rehabilitation, and clinical psychology, SSED allows causal inference from small or unique samples where group designs are impractical.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Double-blind AB design · Single-Subject Experimental Design. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare