Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Dokumentu vākšana× | Tematiskā analīze× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Aptauju metodoloģija | Kvalitatīvie pētījumi |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000s | 2006 |
| Autors≠ | Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn Bowen | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative / mixed data-collection technique | Method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysis | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Saistītās | 3 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|