ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Atsvešināto sēru skala×Teksasas pārskatītais sēru inventārs×
NozareSēru psiholoģijaSēru psiholoģija
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads20021987
AutorsKenneth J. DokaThomas R. Faschingbauer, Sidney Zisook, Richard DeVaul
TipsSelf-report questionnaireSelf-report questionnaire
PirmavotsDoka, K. J. (Ed.). (2002). Disenfranchised grief: New directions, challenges, and strategies for practice. Research Press. link ↗Faschingbauer, T. R., Zisook, S., & DeVaul, R. (1987). The Texas Revised Inventory of Grief. In S. Zisook (Ed.), Biopsychosocial aspects of bereavement (pp. 111–124). American Psychiatric Press. link ↗
Citi nosaukumiDGS, Doka Disenfranchised GriefTRIG, Faschingbauer TRIG, Revised Inventory of Grief
Saistītās44
KopsavilkumsThe Disenfranchised Grief Scale (DGS), developed from Kenneth J. Doka's conceptual framework, assesses grief that society does not recognize, validate, or support—grief that is excluded from public mourning rituals, openly acknowledged grief ceremonies, or institutional support. Examples include loss of a former spouse, affair partner, ex-partner, friend (not family), pet, or pregnancy loss. The DGS captures the unique burden of grieving without social permission or recognition.The Texas Revised Inventory of Grief (TRIG) is a 21-item multidimensional measure developed by Faschingbauer, Zisook, and DeVaul in 1987 to assess both past grief behaviors (how the person grieved when the death occurred) and present grief feelings (current emotional response to loss). The TRIG is unique in distinguishing historical grief response from contemporary grief state, providing a comprehensive temporal and dimensional profile of bereavement.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: DGS · TRIG. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare