Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Diskriminantā validitāte× | Konverģentā validitāte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads | 1959 | 1959 |
| Autors≠ | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| Tips≠ | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| Pirmavots | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| Saistītās≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|