ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Digitālā vizuālā analīze×Konteksa analīze×Digitālā etnografija×Discourse Analysis×
NozareKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvie pētījumi
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads2000s–2010sSystematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018Late 1990s – 2000s1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
AutorsGillian Rose; Sarah Pink (digital extension)Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications researchChristine Hine (virtual ethnography); Robert V. Kozinets (netnography)Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
TipsQualitative analytical approachQualitative / mixed-method research techniqueQualitative research methodMethod
PirmavotsRose, G. (2016). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1473902176Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage. ISBN: 978-1847875228Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
Citi nosaukumiDVA, digital image analysis, online visual analysis, digital visual researchİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysisonline ethnography, virtual ethnography, internet ethnography, netnographyDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
Saistītās6562
KopsavilkumsDigital visual analysis is a qualitative approach for systematically examining visual materials that originate in, circulate through, or are consumed within digital environments — including social media images, video content, screenshots, memes, infographics, and online multimodal texts. Drawing on visual methodologies and digital research methods, it attends not only to what images depict but also to how they are produced, shared, and interpreted within specific digital platforms and social contexts.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.Digital ethnography is a qualitative research method that adapts traditional ethnographic fieldwork to online and digitally mediated settings. Drawing on sustained participant observation, document collection, and sometimes interviews, the researcher immerses themselves in one or more digital communities — social media platforms, forums, gaming spaces, or messaging groups — to understand how culture, identity, and social practice are constructed through digital interaction. The approach recognises that online spaces are not merely reflections of offline life but distinctive sites of cultural production in their own right.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Digital Visual Analysis · Content Analysis · Digital Ethnography · Discourse Analysis. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare