ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Digitālās dzīvesstāstu pētniecība×Autoetnogrāfija×
NozareKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvās metodes
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads2000s (digital turn in life history; rooted in life history tradition since ~1920s)Late 20th century (term coined 1979; method consolidated 1990s–2000s)
AutorsBuilding on Goodson, Roberts, and broader biographical research traditions; digital extension from 2000s onwardCarolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner, Norman Denzin (prominent theorists); David Hayano coined the term in 1979
TipsQualitative biographical research designQualitative research method
PirmavotsGoodson, I., & Gill, S. (2017). The Narrative Turn in Social Research. In I. Goodson & M. Andrews (Eds.), Considering Counter-Narratives (pp. 1–24). John Benjamins. link ↗Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759100947
Citi nosaukumidigital life story research, DLHR, online life history method, digital biographical methodauto-ethnography, AE, personal narrative research, self-ethnography
Saistītās56
KopsavilkumsDigital Life History Research is a qualitative biographical method that investigates how individuals construct, narrate, and preserve their life stories using digital tools and environments. It extends the classical life history tradition into online spaces — gathering data through video interviews, asynchronous email narratives, digital diaries, social media timelines, and multimedia life documents — to understand personal and social experience across time.Autoethnography is a qualitative research method in which the researcher uses systematic self-reflection and personal narrative to examine their own experiences within a cultural, social, or organizational context. By treating the self as both subject and instrument, autoethnography connects individual lived experience to broader cultural patterns, making personal stories analytically and socially significant. It bridges autobiography and ethnography, producing accounts that are simultaneously evocative and scholarly.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Digital Life History Research · Autoethnography. Izgūts 2026-06-20 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare