Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Laboratorija lēmumu pieņemšanas izmēģinājumiem un novērtēšanai× | Aditīvās attiecības novērtējums× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Lēmumu pieņemšana | Lēmumu pieņemšana |
| Saime | MCDM | MCDM |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1972 | 2010 |
| Autors≠ | Gabus, A., Fontela, E. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Tips≠ | Cause-effect influence network (total relation matrix) — produces prominence + relation for criteria weighting | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| Pirmavots≠ | Gabus, A., Fontela, E. (1972). World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva, Switzerland link ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | — | — |
| Saistītās | 8 | 8 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Gabus, A., Fontela, E. in 1972. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|