Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Dienasgaismas simulācija× | Termiskā komforta novērtēšana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Arhitektūra | Arhitektūra |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2006 | 1972 |
| Autors≠ | Christoph Reinhart, John Mardaljevic | Povl Ole Fanger |
| Tips≠ | computational daylighting assessment method | psychrometric comfort assessment method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Reinhart, C. F., Mardaljevic, J., Rogers, Z. (2010). Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design. Leukos, 3(1), 7-31. DOI ↗ | Fanger, P. O. (1972). Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering. Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | daylighting analysis, illuminance simulation, daylight availability assessment | thermal comfort evaluation, adaptive comfort model, PMV-PPD analysis |
| Saistītās | 3 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Daylight Simulation is a computational method for predicting the availability and distribution of daylight in interior spaces and assessing visual comfort under varying sky conditions. Developed by researchers like Christoph Reinhart and John Mardaljevic in the 2000s, it has become central to designing healthy, energy-efficient buildings that maximize natural light while controlling glare. | Thermal Comfort Assessment is a method for evaluating indoor environmental conditions to predict whether occupants will feel thermally comfortable. Pioneered by Povl Ole Fanger in the 1970s, it combines measurements of air temperature, humidity, air speed, and thermal properties of clothing and activity to determine comfort zones and identify remedial actions. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|