Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Dalasas sāpju anketas× | Sāpju katastrofizēšanas skala× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Sāpju medicīna | Sāpju medicīna |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1989 | 1995 |
| Autors≠ | G. Frank Lawlis and colleagues | Michael J. Sullivan and Steven R. Bishop |
| Tips≠ | Self-report questionnaire measuring low back pain functional impact and psychological symptoms | Self-report questionnaire measuring catastrophic thinking about pain |
| Pirmavots≠ | Lawlis, G.F., Cuencas, R., Selby, D., & McCoy, C.E. (1989). The development of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire. An assessment of pain in patients with chronic low-back pain. Spine, 14(5), 511-516. DOI ↗ | Sullivan, M.J., Bishop, S.R., & Pivik, J. (1995). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 7(4), 524-532. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | DPQ, Dallas Back Pain Questionnaire | PCS, Catastrophizing Scale |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ) is a 16-item self-report instrument developed by Lawlis and colleagues in 1989 to assess the multidimensional impact of low back pain. The DPQ captures four domains: daily activities impact, work/leisure impairment, anxiety/depression, and pain severity, providing a comprehensive profile of low back pain's functional and psychological consequences. | The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13-item self-report questionnaire developed by Sullivan, Bishop, and Pivik in 1995 to measure catastrophic thinking about pain—the tendency to magnify pain threat, ruminate about pain, and feel helpless in response to pain. Elevated catastrophizing predicts worse pain outcomes and is a key treatment target in cognitive-behavioral pain management. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|