Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Krīškrustojuma A/B tests× | Eksperiments ar vairākām grupām× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Eksperimentu plānošana | Eksperimentu plānošana |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1949 (crossover design); 2000s (online A/B application) | 1990s–2000s (clinical formalization); multi-arm concept implicit in ANOVA-era factorial designs |
| Autors≠ | Crossover design: E. J. Williams (1949); A/B testing framework: Ronald Fisher (experimental roots); modern online application widely attributed to Google and Microsoft experimentation teams | Developed within clinical trials methodology; formalized by Parmar, Royston and colleagues (UK MRC CTU, early 2000s) |
| Tips≠ | Within-subject controlled experiment | Experimental design |
| Pirmavots≠ | Jones, B., & Kenward, M. G. (2014). Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials (3rd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. ISBN: 9781439861424 | Royston, P., Parmar, M. K. B., & Qian, W. (2003). Novel designs for multi-arm clinical trials with survival outcomes with an application in ovarian cancer. Statistics in Medicine, 22(14), 2239–2256. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | within-subject A/B test, crossover split test, repeated-measures A/B test, AB crossover experiment | multi-arm trial, multiple-arm experiment, multi-group experiment, many-arm design |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | A crossover A/B test is an experimental design in which the same participants or units are exposed to both treatment A and treatment B in sequence, with each serving as their own control. By eliminating between-subject variability, the design achieves higher statistical power than a standard parallel A/B test at the same sample size, but it requires careful handling of carryover effects and time-period confounds. | A multi-arm experiment simultaneously compares three or more treatment or intervention conditions — each called an arm — against a shared control or against one another. By testing multiple alternatives in a single study, it yields more information per participant than running separate two-group experiments sequentially, while controlling the overall Type I error rate through pre-specified comparison strategies. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|