Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Kritiskā institucionālā etnogrāfija× | Teorija saknēs× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvie pētījumi |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1987 (IE foundational); critical applications prominent 1990s–2000s | 1967 |
| Autors≠ | Dorothy E. Smith (institutional ethnography); critical variant developed through feminist and critical scholars | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative research design | Method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | Critical IE, critical-IE, institutional ethnography with critical orientation, CIE | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Critical institutional ethnography (CIE) combines Dorothy Smith's institutional ethnography with an explicit critical theory lens to investigate how ruling relations, texts, and institutional discourses reproduce inequality and power asymmetries. Starting from the lived experiences of people positioned within or subordinated by institutions, CIE traces how abstract institutional processes coordinate everyday life and subjects those processes to normative critique aimed at social transformation. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|