Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Kritiskas gadījumu izpētes× | Pētījums ar gadījumu izpēti× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvās metodes |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1980s–2006 (formalized) | 1984 (seminal codification) |
| Autors≠ | Bent Flyvbjerg (formalized); Robert K. Yin (case study typology) | Robert K. Yin (systematised in Case Study Research, 1984) |
| Tips | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research design |
| Pirmavots≠ | Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. DOI ↗ | Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | critical case, strategic case study, critical-instance case study, paradigmatic case study | Vaka Çalışması (Case Study), case study design, case study methodology |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | A critical case study is a case study design in which the researcher deliberately selects a case that is strategically important for testing, confirming, challenging, or extending an existing proposition, theory, or policy claim. Rather than choosing a typical or representative case, the researcher argues that if the finding holds here — in this most-likely, least-likely, or paradigmatic instance — it can reasonably be expected to hold more broadly. This purposive logic transforms a single case into a powerful analytical tool. | Case study research is a qualitative research design that investigates a specific phenomenon, individual, group, organisation, or event in depth within its real-world context. Systematised by Robert K. Yin in 1984, it supports single-case and multiple-case designs and draws on multiple data sources — interviews, observation, documents, and artefacts — to build a rich, contextualised account of a bounded unit. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|