Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Kopējā proporcionālā novērtēšana× | Attēlu izplūdušais CIMAS variants (Kara et al. 2024)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Lēmumu pieņemšana | Lēmumu pieņemšana |
| Saime | MCDM | MCDM |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1996 | 2024 |
| Autors≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. | Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D. |
| Tips≠ | Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split) | Picture Fuzzy criteria weighting via expert assessment (CIMAS) — PFWA aggregation |
| Pirmavots≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗ | Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D. (2024). A picture fuzzy CIMAS-ARTASI model for website performance analysis in human resource management. Applied Soft Computing DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | — | — |
| Saistītās | 8 | 8 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | PIF-CIMAS (Picture Fuzzy variant of CIMAS (Kara et al. 2024)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|