ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Kopējā proporcionālā novērtēšana×Mērīšana un rangu noteikšana alternatīvām saskaņā ar kompromisa risinājumu×
NozareLēmumu pieņemšanaLēmumu pieņemšana
SaimeMCDMMCDM
Izcelsmes gads19962020
AutorsZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., Chatterjee, P.
TipsProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Utility function (ideal + anti-ideal reference)
PirmavotsZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumi
Saistītās88
KopsavilkumsCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.MARCOS (Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., Chatterjee, P. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: COPRAS · MARCOS. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare