ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Kopējā proporcionālā novērtēšana×Metodoloģija ar logaritmiskiem svērumiem×
NozareLēmumu pieņemšanaLēmumu pieņemšana
SaimeMCDMMCDM
Izcelsmes gads19962021
AutorsZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Biswas, S., Božanić, D.
TipsProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Logarithm-based additive weighting
PirmavotsZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Biswas, S., Božanić, D. (2021). A new logarithm methodology of additive weights (LMAW) for multi-criteria decision-making: Application in logistics. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumi
Saistītās88
KopsavilkumsCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.LMAW (Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Biswas, S., Božanić, D. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: COPRAS · LMAW. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare