Salīdzināt metodes

	Kopējā proporcionālā novērtēšana	Analytic Hierarchy Process	Labākā-Sliktākā metode
Nozare	Lēmumu pieņemšana	Lēmumu pieņemšana	Lēmumu pieņemšana
Saime	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Izcelsmes gads	1996	1980	2015
Autors	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.	Saaty, T. L.	Rezaei, J.
Tips	Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
Pirmavots	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega
Citi nosaukumi	—	—	—
Saistītās	8	8	8
Kopsavilkums	COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.