Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Satura validitāte× | Diskriminantā validitāte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1975 | 1959 |
| Autors≠ | C. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurement | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Tips≠ | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Pirmavots≠ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | content-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validation | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Content validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|