Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Kvalitatīvā satura analīze× | Tematiskā analīze× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Kvalitatīvie pētījumi | Kvalitatīvie pētījumi |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1980 | 2006 |
| Autors≠ | Klaus Krippendorff; refined by Margrit Schreier | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Tips | Method | Method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications. link ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | Content Analysis, Categorical Content Analysis | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Saistītās≠ | 2 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) is a systematic, inductive method for analyzing textual or visual data by identifying and categorizing meaning units into content categories. Developed and formalized by Klaus Krippendorff (1980), QCA can be purely qualitative (inductive, exploratory) or combined with quantitative counting; it analyzes manifest content (explicit, surface meanings) and latent content (underlying, interpretive meanings). | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|