Salīdzināt metodes

	Interešu konflikts pētniecībā	Principi pētniecības integritātes
Nozare	Pētniecības ētika	Pētniecības ētika
Saime	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads	2013	2007
Autors	Multiple (NIH, ICMJE, institutional COI policies)	Multiple (National Academies, NIH/ORI, ESOMAR, individual discipline standards)
Tips	Guideline	Framework
Pirmavots	International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2023). Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. ICMJE Recommendations for Manuscript Authorship.	National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Fostering Integrity in Research. The National Academies Press.
Citi nosaukumi	COI, Conflicts of Interest	Responsible Conduct of Research, RCR, Research Ethics Standards
Saistītās	3	4
Kopsavilkums	A conflict of interest (COI) in research exists when a researcher has financial, professional, or personal interests that might bias their research judgment or outcomes. Conflicts are inherent in research communities—researchers often have legitimate stakes in their research's success—but unmanaged conflicts compromise research integrity and public trust. Managing COI requires transparent disclosure, institutional oversight, and proactive mitigation strategies to minimize bias risk while allowing legitimate research to proceed.	Research integrity encompasses the ethical and professional standards that guide responsible conduct in all aspects of research—from study design and data collection through analysis, reporting, and publication. The core principles—honesty, transparency, accountability, respect, and stewardship—ensure that research is trustworthy, reproducible, and contributes legitimate knowledge. These principles are universal across disciplines and are enforced through institutional policies, professional standards, and regulatory oversight. Violations of research integrity undermine scientific credibility and can harm subjects, institutions, and public trust.