Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Vienlaicīgi iegultā jaukto metožu pieeja× | Transformējošā jauktās metodes dizains× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Pētījuma dizains | Pētījuma dizains |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2003–2007 | 2003–2009 |
| Autors≠ | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Tips | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Pirmavots≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Citi nosaukumi | embedded mixed methods, nested mixed methods design, concurrent nested design, CEMM | transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods |
| Saistītās | 6 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The concurrent embedded mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data at the same time, but assigns unequal priority to the two strands: one (usually quantitative) serves as the primary study, while the other (usually qualitative) is nested inside it to answer a supplementary question. The embedded strand does not stand alone; it provides a different perspective on the same phenomenon within a single unified study. | Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|