ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Datorizēta adaptīvā testa diferenciālā vienumu funkcionēšana (CAT-DIF)×Daudzgrupu atšķirīgās pozīcijas funkcionēšana (MG-DIF)×
NozarePsihometrijaPsihometrija
SaimeLatent structureLatent structure
Izcelsmes gads1990s–2000s1980s-1990s
AutorsWainer, Zwick, and colleagues in the CAT and DIF literaturesShealy & Stout (SIBTEST framework); Lord (IRT-based DIF)
TipsItem bias detection in adaptive testingMeasurement bias detection
PirmavotsZwick, R., Thayer, D. T., & Mazzeo, J. (1997). Describing and categorizing DIF in polytomous items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34(4), 261–285. DOI ↗Millsap, R. E. (2012). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728936
Citi nosaukumiCAT DIF analysis, adaptive test DIF, DIF in computerized adaptive testing, CAT item bias detectionMG-DIF, multi-group DIF, differential item functioning across groups, multiple-group DIF analysis
Saistītās66
KopsavilkumsCAT-DIF identifies items in a computerized adaptive test that behave differently across demographic or group subpopulations after controlling for overall ability. Because adaptive algorithms select items non-randomly based on each examinee's estimated proficiency, standard DIF detection methods require adjustment before they can be validly applied in this context.Multi-group differential item functioning examines whether test or scale items function equivalently across three or more distinct groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or country — after matching respondents on the underlying trait being measured. Items that behave differently across groups threaten fair measurement and valid score comparisons.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: CAT-DIF · Multi-group Differential Item Functioning. Izgūts 2026-06-15 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare