Salīdzināt metodes

	Salīdzinošā tematisko analīze	Tematiskā analīze
Nozare	Kvalitatīvās metodes	Kvalitatīvie pētījumi
Saime	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads	2000s–2010s (as an explicit comparative variant of thematic analysis)	2006
Autors	Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis foundation); comparative extension developed in applied policy and cross-cultural qualitative research traditions	Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
Tips	Qualitative comparative analytical strategy	Method
Pirmavots	Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.	Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Citi nosaukumi	cross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, multi-group thematic analysis, comparative qualitative thematic analysis	TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
Saistītās	6	3
Kopsavilkums	Comparative Thematic Analysis applies the structured procedures of thematic analysis across two or more distinct groups, sites, or time points, with the explicit aim of identifying both shared patterns and meaningful differences. Rather than producing a single composite account of experience, it yields a layered analysis that maps where themes converge and diverge across comparison units — making it especially valuable for policy-relevant, cross-cultural, or multi-site qualitative studies.	Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.