Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Salīdzinošā relāciju aptauja× | Daudzvariēblu korelācijas pētījumi× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Pētījuma dizains | Pētījuma dizains |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | Mid-20th century onward; systematized in educational research c. 1960s–1990s | 1920s–1930s (multivariate extensions); consolidated in applied social science by 1970s |
| Autors≠ | Rooted in survey methodology tradition; formalized by scholars such as Fraenkel, Wallen, and Creswell | Developed from Galton and Pearson's bivariate correlation work, extended to multivariate contexts by R.A. Fisher, Harold Hotelling, and others |
| Tips≠ | Quantitative non-experimental survey design | Non-experimental quantitative research design |
| Pirmavots≠ | Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0073525 670 | Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics (7th ed.). Pearson. ISBN: 978-0134790541 |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | comparative correlational survey, multi-group relational survey, cross-group relational survey design | multivariate correlational design, multivariate relational research, multiple-variable correlational study, multivariate associational research |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 2 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | A comparative relational survey is a quantitative, non-experimental design that examines the relationships among variables within a single study while simultaneously comparing those relationship patterns across two or more distinct groups. It extends a standard relational (correlational) survey by adding a comparative dimension, revealing whether associations observed in one group hold, differ, or even reverse in another. It is widely used in education, psychology, organizational behavior, and health sciences. | Multivariate correlational research is a non-experimental quantitative design that examines the simultaneous associations among three or more variables. Rather than manipulating conditions, the researcher measures naturally occurring variables and uses techniques such as multiple regression, canonical correlation, or structural equation modeling to map the pattern and strength of their interrelationships. It is the dominant design when the goal is to understand how a set of predictors jointly relates to one or more outcome variables. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|