ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Salīdzinošā naratīvā izpēte×Salīdzinošā tematisko analīze×
NozareKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvās metodes
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1990s–2000s2000s–2010s (as an explicit comparative variant of thematic analysis)
AutorsD. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); comparative extension by the broader qualitative comparative traditionVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis foundation); comparative extension developed in applied policy and cross-cultural qualitative research traditions
TipsQualitative comparative research designQualitative comparative analytical strategy
PirmavotsClandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumicomparative narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, narrative comparison, comparative narrative analysiscross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, multi-group thematic analysis, comparative qualitative thematic analysis
Saistītās66
KopsavilkumsComparative narrative research is a qualitative design that collects personal stories or life accounts from two or more participants, groups, or contexts and systematically compares them to reveal patterns, contrasts, and contextual influences. Drawing on narrative inquiry's attention to experience-as-story, it adds a deliberate comparative logic to identify what is shared, what diverges, and why differences emerge across cases.Comparative Thematic Analysis applies the structured procedures of thematic analysis across two or more distinct groups, sites, or time points, with the explicit aim of identifying both shared patterns and meaningful differences. Rather than producing a single composite account of experience, it yields a layered analysis that maps where themes converge and diverge across comparison units — making it especially valuable for policy-relevant, cross-cultural, or multi-site qualitative studies.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Comparative Narrative Research · Comparative Thematic Analysis. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare