ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Salīdzināmā etnografija×Digitālā etnografija×
NozareKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvās metodes
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized)Late 1990s – 2000s
AutorsGeorge E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic)Christine Hine (virtual ethnography); Robert V. Kozinets (netnography)
TipsQualitative comparative research designQualitative research method
PirmavotsMarcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage. ISBN: 978-1847875228
Citi nosaukumimulti-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observationonline ethnography, virtual ethnography, internet ethnography, netnography
Saistītās66
KopsavilkumsComparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone.Digital ethnography is a qualitative research method that adapts traditional ethnographic fieldwork to online and digitally mediated settings. Drawing on sustained participant observation, document collection, and sometimes interviews, the researcher immerses themselves in one or more digital communities — social media platforms, forums, gaming spaces, or messaging groups — to understand how culture, identity, and social practice are constructed through digital interaction. The approach recognises that online spaces are not merely reflections of offline life but distinctive sites of cultural production in their own right.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Comparative Ethnography · Digital Ethnography. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare