Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Salīdzinošā digitālā etnogrāfija× | Salīdzinošā gadījumu izpēte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvās metodes |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1995–2000 (multi-sited framework 1995; virtual ethnography 2000) | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| Autors≠ | Christine Hine (digital ethnography); George E. Marcus (multi-sited ethnography) | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| Pirmavots≠ | Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761958963 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| Citi nosaukumi | CDE, multi-site digital ethnography, cross-platform ethnography, comparative virtual ethnography | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| Saistītās≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Comparative Digital Ethnography (CDE) is a qualitative design that applies ethnographic methods — sustained participant observation, interview, and artefact analysis — across two or more digital settings simultaneously. By systematically comparing practices, meanings, and interactions in different online environments (e.g., distinct platforms, communities, or national contexts), CDE surfaces both site-specific patterns and cross-cutting cultural logics that a single-site study would miss. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|