Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Salīdzinošā apstiprinošā pētniecība× | Pēctīgās konfirmācijas izpētēs metodes× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Pētījuma dizains | Pētījuma dizains |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1971 (Jöreskog); systematized in organizational research by 2000 | 1970s onward; consolidated in SEM literature from 1990s |
| Autors≠ | Karl Jöreskog (multigroup CFA foundation); Robert Vandenberg & Charles Lance (organizational application) | Synthesized from longitudinal design traditions (e.g., Baltes & Nesselroade, 1979) and confirmatory analytic frameworks (Joreskog, 1969) |
| Tips≠ | Quantitative comparative research design | Quantitative research design |
| Pirmavots≠ | Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ | Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195152968 |
| Citi nosaukumi | multigroup confirmatory research, cross-group confirmatory study, comparative hypothesis testing design, comparative model testing research | longitudinal confirmatory study, confirmatory longitudinal design, longitudinal hypothesis-testing design, longitudinal CFA design |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Comparative confirmatory research tests whether a pre-specified theoretical model or set of hypotheses holds equivalently across two or more distinct groups, time points, or contexts. It extends standard confirmatory analysis by explicitly imposing and evaluating equality constraints across groups, determining not only whether a model fits the data but whether its structure, factor loadings, and parameter estimates are comparable across populations. This design is foundational to cross-cultural, multi-site, and subgroup comparison studies. | Longitudinal confirmatory research combines the temporal depth of longitudinal design with the hypothesis-driven logic of confirmatory analysis. The researcher specifies a priori hypotheses or structural models about how variables change or remain stable over time, then tests those predictions against data collected at two or more time points. It is the design of choice when theory is mature enough to make specific predictions about developmental, causal, or stability processes. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|