Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| COBRA (COmprehensive distance Based RAnking)× | Analytic Hierarchy Process× | Analytic Network Process (ANP ar atgriezenisko saiti un savstarpēju atkarību)× | Labākā-Sliktākā metode× | CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Lēmumu pieņemšana | Lēmumu pieņemšana | Lēmumu pieņemšana | Lēmumu pieņemšana | Lēmumu pieņemšana |
| Saime | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2022 | 1980 | 1996 | 2015 | 1995 |
| Autors≠ | Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G. P., Tadić, S., Kovač, M., Miglietta, P. P. | Saaty, T. L. | Saaty, T. L. | Rezaei, J. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tips≠ | Distance from PIS/NIS/AS (Euclidean × Taxicab combined) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Pirmavots≠ | Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G. P., Tadić, S., Kovač, M., Miglietta, P. P. (2022). A Novel Axiomatic DEA-COBRA Framework for Evaluating the Sustainable Performance of Agri-Food Systems. Sustainability link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | — | — | — | — | — |
| Saistītās | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | COBRA (COmprehensive distance Based RAnking) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G. P., Tadić, S., Kovač, M., Miglietta, P. P. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|
|
|
|