Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research× | Zināšanu pārvēršana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Ieviešanas zinātne | Ieviešanas zinātne |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2009 | 2004 |
| Autors≠ | Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., et al. | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) |
| Tips | Framework | Framework |
| Pirmavots≠ | Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowson, E. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50. DOI ↗ | Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2004). Knowledge Translation Strategy 2004-2009. CIHR, Ottawa. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | CFIR, CFIR model, consolidated framework | KT, evidence-to-practice, research-to-practice |
| Saistītās | 5 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a five-domain model designed to systematically evaluate the factors influencing implementation success of evidence-based interventions in health systems. Developed by Damschroder et al. (2009) and refined through extensive use across health domains, CFIR provides a structured vocabulary and taxonomy of 39 constructs that identify implementation barriers and facilitators across intervention characteristics, organizational context, individual factors, and implementation process. | Knowledge Translation (KT) is the systematic synthesis, dissemination, exchange, and application of research findings to improve health outcomes and healthcare practice. First formalized by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research in 2004, KT recognizes that evidence generation alone does not automatically change clinical or policy behaviour, and structures a purposeful process to bridge the gap between research and practice. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|