Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Keramikas petrogrāfija× | Ģeometriskā morfometrija× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Arheoloģija | Arheoloģija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1976 | 1991 |
| Autors≠ | Peter Stimmung | Fred Bookstein |
| Tips≠ | Clay and temper sourcing | Shape and form analysis |
| Pirmavots≠ | Quinn, P. S. (2013). Ceramic Petrology: The Interpretation of Ceramic Artifacts in Archaeological Science. Archaeopress. link ↗ | Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | ceramic thin section analysis, pottery petrography | shape analysis, morphometric analysis |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Ceramic petrography analyzes pottery through microscopic examination of thin sections cut from pottery sherds. This method determines clay sources, identifies non-plastic inclusions (temper), and reconstructs pottery production technology. Pioneered by Peter Stimmung and others, ceramic petrography reveals whether pottery was made locally or imported, and whether specific production groups or workshops created vessels with distinctive raw material recipes. | Geometric morphometrics is a quantitative analytical method that captures, analyzes, and compares the shapes of biological structures (bones, teeth, pottery) using coordinate data from landmarks and outlines. Developed by Fred Bookstein in the 1990s, GMM provides a rigorous statistical framework for studying shape variation across populations or time periods. The method allows archaeologists to quantify morphological differences between individuals, populations, or artifact classes with precision impossible using traditional linear measurements. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|