ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

CatBoost×Regularizēta gradientu pastiprināšana×Regularized LightGBM×
NozareMašīnmācīšanāsMašīnmācīšanāsMašīnmācīšanās
SaimeMachine learningMachine learningMachine learning
Izcelsmes gads20182001 (gradient boosting); 2016 (explicit L1/L2 regularization in XGBoost)2017
AutorsProkhorenkova, L. et al. (Yandex)Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. (building on Friedman, J. H.)Ke, G. et al. (Microsoft Research)
TipsGradient boosting on decision treesRegularized ensemble (additive tree model)Regularized gradient boosting ensemble
PirmavotsProkhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., Dorogush, A.V. & Gulin, A. (2018). CatBoost: Unbiased Boosting with Categorical Features. In NeurIPS 2018. DOI ↗Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. DOI ↗Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., & Liu, T.-Y. (2017). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 3146–3154. link ↗
Citi nosaukumiCatBoost (Categorical Boosting), categorical boosting, ordered boosting, kategorik gradyan artırmapenalized gradient boosting, shrinkage-regularized boosting, XGBoost-style regularization, L1/L2 gradient boostingLightGBM with L1/L2 regularization, penalized LightGBM, LightGBM ridge/lasso, regularized LGBM
Saistītās565
KopsavilkumsCatBoost is a gradient boosting algorithm, introduced by Prokhorenkova and colleagues at Yandex in 2018, that handles categorical variables natively and uses ordered target encoding to avoid label leakage. By building an additive ensemble of trees while permuting the data order at each iteration, it is often superior to XGBoost and LightGBM on category-heavy data.Regularized gradient boosting extends the classic additive tree ensemble (Friedman 2001) by embedding L1 and L2 penalty terms directly into the training objective, along with a complexity penalty on tree size. Popularized by XGBoost (Chen & Guestrin 2016), this framework reduces overfitting and improves generalization compared to unpenalized boosting, while retaining the method's characteristic accuracy on tabular data.Regularized LightGBM applies L1 (lasso) and L2 (ridge) penalty terms to the leaf weight objective of LightGBM — Microsoft's highly efficient gradient boosting framework — to control model complexity, reduce overfitting, and improve generalization on tabular classification and regression tasks with high-dimensional or noisy feature sets.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: CatBoost · Regularized Gradient Boosting · Regularized LightGBM. Izgūts 2026-06-17 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare