Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Checklist× | Cochrane riska novērtēšanas rīks 2.0 randomizētiem kontrolētiem pētījumiem× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Pētniecības metodoloģija | Pētniecības metodoloģija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1993 (updated through 2023) | 2019 |
| Autors≠ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) | Jonathan Sterne, Julian Higgins (Cochrane Collaboration) |
| Tips | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment |
| Pirmavots≠ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ | Sterne, J. A., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., ... & Higgins, J. P. (2019). RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, l4898. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | CASP-RCT, CASP | RoB 2.0, RoB 2 |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. | RoB 2 is the Cochrane Collaboration's updated methodology for assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Published in 2019, it replaced the original Cochrane RoB tool with a more structured, transparent approach using signalling questions and domain-based judgments to evaluate five critical sources of bias. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|