Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Labākā-Sliktākā metode× | Kopējā proporcionālā novērtēšana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Lēmumu pieņemšana | Lēmumu pieņemšana |
| Saime | MCDM | MCDM |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2015 | 1996 |
| Autors≠ | Rezaei, J. | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. |
| Tips≠ | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP | Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split) |
| Pirmavots≠ | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | — | — |
| Saistītās | 8 | 8 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|