Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Ēku energoefektivitātes simulācija× | Termiskā komforta novērtēšana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Arhitektūra | Arhitektūra |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1993 | 1972 |
| Autors≠ | Joe Clarke, Drury Crawley | Povl Ole Fanger |
| Tips≠ | dynamic thermal and energy simulation method | psychrometric comfort assessment method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Crawley, D. B., Hand, J. W., Kummert, M., Griffith, B. T. (2008). Contrasting the Capabilities of Building Energy Performance Simulation Programs. Building and Environment, 43(4), 661-673. DOI ↗ | Fanger, P. O. (1972). Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering. Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | energy simulation, building thermal modeling, annual energy consumption analysis | thermal comfort evaluation, adaptive comfort model, PMV-PPD analysis |
| Saistītās | 3 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Building Energy Performance Simulation is a computational method for predicting how much energy a building consumes for heating, cooling, lighting, and equipment operation under specified weather and occupancy conditions. Pioneered by researchers like Joe Clarke and Drury Crawley in the 1990s, it has become essential for design optimization, compliance demonstration, and operational planning. | Thermal Comfort Assessment is a method for evaluating indoor environmental conditions to predict whether occupants will feel thermally comfortable. Pioneered by Povl Ole Fanger in the 1970s, it combines measurements of air temperature, humidity, air speed, and thermal properties of clothing and activity to determine comfort zones and identify remedial actions. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|