Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Bibliometriskā tematiskās evolūcijas analīze× | Zinātnes kartēšana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Zinātnometrija | Bibliometrija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2017 (bibliometrix package); thematic evolution approach ~2011 | 2000s |
| Autors≠ | Massimo Aria & Corrado Cuccurullo (bibliometrix package); thematic evolution method from Cobo et al. | Katy Börner, Chaomei Chen, and others |
| Tips≠ | Computational scientometric workflow | Method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. DOI ↗ | Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | bibliometrix thematic map analysis, R-based thematic evolution analysis, bibliometrix strategic diagram analysis, thematic evolution analysis with bibliometrix | knowledge mapping, domain mapping, research landscape visualization |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Bibliometrix-assisted thematic evolution analysis uses the bibliometrix R package to trace how research themes emerge, mature, decline, or transform across successive time periods within a scientific field. By combining co-word analysis with strategic diagram visualisation, the workflow maps the intellectual structure of a field and reveals longitudinal shifts in topic centrality and development, producing reproducible, publication-ready outputs within a single R environment. | Science mapping is a bibliometric visualization method that creates visual representations of research domains, showing the structure, development, and relationships of scientific fields. Using bibliographic data (citations, keywords, authors, journals), science mapping algorithms generate network diagrams where nodes represent documents, concepts, or authors and edges represent relationships (citation, collaboration, semantic similarity). The resulting maps make invisible intellectual structures visible, enabling researchers to understand field topology, identify emerging areas, and navigate disciplinary landscapes. Pioneered by Börner, Chen, and Boyack in the 2000s, science mapping has become a standard tool in research evaluation and strategic planning. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|