ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Beijesiskā pretfaktiskā ietekmes novērtēšana×Beijesa atšķirību atšķirību metode×
NozareCēloņsakarību secināšanaCēloņsakarību secināšana
SaimeRegression modelRegression model
Izcelsmes gads2015 (canonical implementation); Rubin potential outcomes: 1974-20052015-2023
AutorsBrodersen, Gallusser, Koehler, Remy & Scott; Rubin potential outcomes frameworkLi & Marchand (formal Bayesian DiD framework); Brodersen et al. (Bayesian causal inference in time series)
TipsBayesian causal inference / counterfactual estimationBayesian causal inference / panel regression
PirmavotsBrodersen, K. H., Gallusser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N., & Scott, S. L. (2015). Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247-274. DOI ↗Li, F., & Marchand, J. (2023). Bayesian inference for difference-in-differences. Econometrics Journal, 26(3), 509-529. link ↗
Citi nosaukumiBayesian CIE, Bayesian causal impact, Bayesian structural time-series causal inference, BSTS counterfactual evaluationBayesian DiD, Bayes DiD, Bayesian diff-in-diff, Bayesian panel causal estimator
Saistītās55
KopsavilkumsBayesian Counterfactual Impact Evaluation estimates the causal effect of an intervention by constructing a Bayesian posterior distribution over the counterfactual outcome — what would have happened without treatment. The method, popularized by Brodersen et al. (2015) through the CausalImpact framework, uses Bayesian structural time-series models fitted on the pre-intervention period to predict the counterfactual trajectory, then compares observed post-intervention outcomes to that prediction.Bayesian Difference-in-Differences applies Bayesian statistical inference to the classic DiD design, replacing frequentist point estimates with full posterior distributions over the treatment effect. This yields not only an estimate of the causal effect but also a coherent probability statement about its magnitude and uncertainty, making it especially useful when sample sizes are modest or informative prior knowledge is available.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Bayesian Counterfactual Impact Evaluation · Bayesian Difference-in-Differences. Izgūts 2026-06-15 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare