ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Arhitektūras smaku noteikšana×Defektu prognozēšanas modelis×
NozareProgrammatūras inženierijaProgrammatūras inženierija
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads20092005
AutorsMartin Fowler and García et al.Thomas Ostrand, Elaine Weyuker, Robert Bell
Tipspattern-based analysismachine learning model
PirmavotsFowler, M. (2018). Code smell. Martin Fowler's Website. link ↗Ostrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J., & Bell, R. M. (2005). Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(4), 340–355. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumidesign smell detection, architectural debt analysis, system quality assessmentfault prediction, bug prediction, defect classification
Saistītās44
KopsavilkumsArchitecture smells are recurring patterns in system structure that indicate potential design problems. Introduced by García et al. (2009), these patterns signal violations of architectural principles (modularity, independence, abstraction) at system scale. Detection combines code metrics, dependency analysis, and pattern recognition to identify smells early, guiding refactoring and architectural improvements.Defect prediction models forecast the likelihood of software faults in code modules using statistical or machine learning approaches. Pioneered by Ostrand, Weyuker, and Bell (2005), these models correlate code metrics (complexity, churn, coupling) with historical defect data to identify high-risk components. Organizations use predictions to allocate testing resources, guide code review, and prioritize refactoring.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Architecture Smell Detection · Defect Prediction Model. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare