Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Analytic Hierarchy Process× | Novērtēšana, balstoties uz atšķirību no vidējā risinājuma× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Lēmumu pieņemšana | Lēmumu pieņemšana |
| Saime | MCDM | MCDM |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1980 | 2015 |
| Autors≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. |
| Tips≠ | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Distance from average solution |
| Pirmavots≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | — | — |
| Saistītās | 8 | 8 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|