ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Advocacy Coalition Framework×Multiple Streams Analysis×
NozarePublic PolicyPublic Policy
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads19931984
AutorsPaul Sabatier & Hank Jenkins-SmithJohn W. Kingdon
TipsTheory of the policy processTheory of agenda setting and the policy process
PirmavotsSabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.) (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN: 9780813316499Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Longman. ISBN: 9780321121851
Citi nosaukumiACF, Sabatier-Jenkins-Smith Framework, Advocacy Coalition ApproachMSF, Multiple Streams Framework, Kingdon Multiple Streams, Policy Windows Analysis
Saistītās44
KopsavilkumsThe Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is a theory of the policy process developed by Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith from the late 1980s and consolidated in their 1993 volume Policy Change and Learning. It explains policy stability and change over long periods by analysing competing coalitions of actors within a policy subsystem who are bound together by shared beliefs. Policy change is understood as a function of the interaction among these belief-based coalitions, the policy-oriented learning that occurs over time, and external events and shocks that can shift the balance of power among them.The Multiple Streams Framework (MSF) is a theory of agenda setting and policy change developed by John Kingdon in his 1984 book Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. It explains why some issues rise to prominence and some solutions are adopted while others languish, by modelling the policy process as three largely independent 'streams' — problems, policies, and politics — that flow through the system. Change becomes possible when these streams are joined together at a fleeting 'policy window', often through the efforts of a 'policy entrepreneur'. The framework emphasises ambiguity, timing and chance over orderly, rational problem-solving.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Advocacy Coalition Framework · Multiple Streams Analysis. Izgūts 2026-06-24 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare