Everyday Life Information Seeking
Also known as: ELIS, Savolainen ELIS Model, Way of Life and Mastery of Life Model, Non-Work Information Seeking
Everyday Life Information Seeking (ELIS), introduced by Reijo Savolainen in his 1995 article in Library & Information Science Research, shifts the study of information behaviour away from work and professional tasks toward the ordinary, non-work information practices of daily life. Savolainen explains these practices through two linked concepts borrowed in part from Bourdieu: 'way of life,' the taken-for-granted order of things that structures how a person spends time, money and attention, and 'mastery of life,' the active effort to keep that order coherent and to restore it when disrupted. Both are shaped by habitus and social class, which mold a person's source preferences and problem-solving styles. ELIS thus situates everyday seeking within a socio-cultural and value framework rather than treating it as isolated, task-driven retrieval.
Key highlights
- Opened the systematic study of non-work, everyday information seeking that earlier task-centered models neglected.
- Grounds information behaviour in socio-cultural context, explaining systematic differences through habitus and social class.
- Links a stable structure (way of life) to dynamic seeking (mastery of life) in a single coherent framework.
- Foregrounds habitual, value-laden source preferences and the role of accessibility in everyday source choice.
Intuition
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
How it works
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
When to use it
Use ELIS when you are studying information seeking outside work and professional roles — health, hobbies, consumer, civic, parenting or other everyday domains — and want to explain it in relation to people's broader way of life, dispositions and social position rather than as isolated task performance. It is well suited to research on how ordinary people stay informed and solve daily problems, to understanding source preferences and information habits, and to revealing how social class and habitus shape information practices. It is less appropriate for narrowly defined work-task searches, for one-off retrieval evaluations, or where you need a predictive computational model. Because it is socio-cultural and qualitative in spirit, applying ELIS well means gathering contextual accounts of daily life and source use, often through interviews and surveys, and interpreting them against way-of-life and mastery-of-life concepts.
Strengths & limitations
- Opened the systematic study of non-work, everyday information seeking that earlier task-centered models neglected.
- Grounds information behaviour in socio-cultural context, explaining systematic differences through habitus and social class.
- Links a stable structure (way of life) to dynamic seeking (mastery of life) in a single coherent framework.
- Foregrounds habitual, value-laden source preferences and the role of accessibility in everyday source choice.
- Its rich socio-cultural concepts (habitus, mastery styles) are difficult to operationalize and measure consistently.
- The mastery-of-life styles are ideal types that real people only approximate, complicating empirical classification.
- Largely descriptive and interpretive, it offers limited predictive precision about specific seeking outcomes.
- Derived from particular cultural and class contexts, so generalizations require care across societies and groups.
Common pitfalls
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
Applications
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
Frequently asked
What do 'way of life' and 'mastery of life' mean in ELIS?
Way of life is the relatively settled 'order of things' that organizes a person's daily existence — how they divide time between work and leisure, structure consumption, and pursue interests — shaped by their habitus. Mastery of life is the active effort to keep that order coherent and to restore it when problems disrupt it. Information seeking flows from both: it is part of how people maintain their everyday order and repair it when something goes wrong. Savolainen further distinguishes mastery styles (optimistic-cognitive, pessimistic-cognitive, defensive-affective, pessimistic-affective) describing how confidently and systematically people tackle problems.
How does ELIS differ from work-task models of information seeking?
Work-task models study information seeking as goal-directed activity tied to a job or professional problem. ELIS deliberately turns to the non-work sphere — the everyday domains of health, family, hobbies, consumption and civic life — and explains seeking there in relation to a person's whole way of life and social position rather than to a discrete task. It treats much everyday seeking as habitual and embedded in routine, triggered by disruptions to one's order, and shaped by class and habitus, which work-task models generally hold constant or ignore.
Why does ELIS bring in social class and habitus?
Because Savolainen found that everyday information behaviour varies systematically with social position, not just with the immediate situation. Drawing on Bourdieu, ELIS holds that habitus — durable dispositions acquired through one's social trajectory — and material and cultural capital shape what order a person keeps, how they go about mastering life, and which sources feel natural, accessible and trustworthy. This socio-cultural grounding lets the model explain patterned differences in everyday seeking and source preference across social groups, which purely individual cognitive accounts cannot.
Sources
- 1.Savolainen, R. (1995). Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of 'way of life'. Library & Information Science Research, 17(3), 259-294.
You have read it. What now?
Cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Everyday Life Information Seeking. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/library-information-science/everyday-life-information-seeking