방법 증거 기록

Computerized adaptive test construct validity

Construct validity in computerized adaptive testing evaluates whether the latent trait estimates produced by a CAT instrument genuinely measure the intended psychological or educational construct. Because adaptive algorithms select items individually for each examinee, the validity evidence gathered must account for the variable item exposure and the IRT-based scoring that are unique to CAT administrations.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

원본 기록

방법의 원본 기록에서 그대로 복사된 인용입니다. 이로부터 수준별 검증이 추론되지 않습니다.

Construct Validity in Computerized Adaptive Testing

분류학적 방법 기록 · latent-structure / psychometrics

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). American Council on Education / Macmillan. · URL
van der Linden, W. J. & Glas, C. A. W. (Eds.). (2010). Elements of Adaptive Testing. Springer. · ISBN 978-0387854595

전체 방법 열기

큐레이션된 주장

각각 자체 평가와 함께 증거 원장에 유지된 주장입니다.

아직 큐레이션된 주장이 없습니다

원장에 주장 평가가 없는 경우 이 보기에서는 주장 평가를 만들지 않습니다.

관련 방법

방법 그래프에서 생성되었으며 기계가 제안한 관계로 표시됩니다 — 증거 주장이 추론되지 않습니다.

Taxonomic bucketComputerized Adaptive Test Convergent Validitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketComputerized adaptive test item response theorymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketComputerized adaptive test measurement invariancemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketConfirmatory factor analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketConstruct Validitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketDifferential Item Functioningmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.