Age-Period-Cohort Analysis
Age-period-cohort (APC) analysis decomposes variation in disease or mortality rates into three temporal components: the effect of age (biological and accumulated risk), the effect of period (influences hitting everyone alive at a given calendar time, such as a new treatment or a recession), and the effect of cohort (lasting imprints of the conditions into which a birth generation was born). Theodore Holford's 1983 Biometrics paper gave the canonical generalized-linear-model formulation and exposed the method's defining obstacle: because cohort equals period minus age, the three predictors are exactly linearly dependent, so their individual linear slopes cannot be separately identified. A large methodological literature has since proposed constraints, reparameterizations, and estimators to extract whatever the data can legitimately support. Yang, Schulhofer-Wohl, Fu, and Land's 2008 work popularized the intrinsic estimator, a principled choice among the infinitely many fitting solutions. APC analysis is a workhorse of descriptive epidemiology and demography, used to read the temporal fingerprints left on rates of cancer, suicide, obesity, and mortality. Done carefully it separates signal from artifact; done carelessly it manufactures trends that the identification problem makes unknowable.
원본 기록
방법의 원본 기록에서 그대로 복사된 인용입니다. 이로부터 수준별 검증이 추론되지 않습니다.
- Holford, T. R. (1983). The Estimation of Age, Period and Cohort Effects for Vital Rates. Biometrics, 39(2), 311-324. · DOI 10.2307/2531004
- Yang, Y., Schulhofer-Wohl, S., Fu, W. J., & Land, K. C. (2008). The Intrinsic Estimator for Age-Period-Cohort Analysis: What It Is and How to Use It. American Journal of Sociology, 113(6), 1697-1736. · DOI 10.1086/587154
큐레이션된 주장
각각 자체 평가와 함께 증거 원장에 유지된 주장입니다.
원장에 주장 평가가 없는 경우 이 보기에서는 주장 평가를 만들지 않습니다.
관련 방법
방법 그래프에서 생성되었으며 기계가 제안한 관계로 표시됩니다 — 증거 주장이 추론되지 않습니다.