GE-McKinsey Nine-Box Matrix
The GE-McKinsey nine-box matrix is a multifactor portfolio-analysis tool that positions a company's business units in a three-by-three grid defined by two composite dimensions: the attractiveness of the industry the unit competes in, and the unit's competitive strength within it. Developed by General Electric with McKinsey & Company in the early 1970s as a richer alternative to the BCG growth-share matrix, it replaces single proxies (market growth and relative share) with weighted indices built from many underlying factors. Hax and Majluf's 1983 Interfaces article gave the matrix a systematic methodological treatment, and Wind, Mahajan, and Swire's 1983 Journal of Marketing study empirically compared it with other standardized portfolio models, showing how much business positions depend on model choice. The nine cells map onto invest-grow, selectivity, and harvest-divest zones that guide resource allocation.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Hax, A. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1983). The Use of the Industry Attractiveness-Business Strength Matrix in Strategic Planning. Interfaces, 13(2), 54-71. DOI: 10.1287/inte.13.2.54 ↗
- Wind, Y., Mahajan, V., & Swire, D. J. (1983). An Empirical Comparison of Standardized Portfolio Models. Journal of Marketing, 47(2), 89-99. DOI: 10.1177/002224298304700209 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). GE-McKinsey Nine-Box Matrix (Industry Attractiveness-Business Strength Portfolio). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/strategic-management/ge-mckinsey-matrix
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- BCG Growth-Share Matrix経営戦略論↔ 比較
- Diversification-Performance Analysis (Rumelt Categories)経営戦略論↔ 比較
- Porter's Five Forces Industry Analysis経営戦略論↔ 比較
- Strategic Value Chain Analysis経営戦略論↔ 比較