Expert Survey
An expert survey measures latent political quantities — most often parties' positions on policy dimensions — by asking a panel of country and subject-matter experts to place the objects of interest on structured numerical scales. Averaging many experts' judgments yields position estimates, while the spread across experts provides a built-in measure of uncertainty and reliability. The Chapel Hill Expert Survey is the leading example, producing comparable measures of European parties' positions on ideology, European integration, and many specific issues over time.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Bakker, R., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., & Vachudova, M. A. (2015). Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010. Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152. DOI: 10.1177/1354068812462931 ↗
- Steenbergen, M. R., & Marks, G. (2007). Evaluating Expert Judgments. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 347–366. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00694.x ↗
- Hooghe, L., Bakker, R., Brigevich, A., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Marks, G., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., & Vachudova, M. (2010). Reliability and Validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill Expert Surveys on Party Positioning. European Journal of Political Research, 49(5), 687–703. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01912.x ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Expert Survey for Measuring Party and Policy Positions. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/political-science/expert-survey
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Ideal Point EstimationPolitical Science↔ 比較
- Manifesto CodingPolitical Science↔ 比較
- Randomized Response TechniquePolitical Science↔ 比較
- Wordfish ScalingPolitical Science↔ 比較