Dator's Four Futures Archetypes
Dator's Four Futures Archetypes is a deductive, template-driven approach to scenario construction in which four generic story-shapes — continuation (continued growth), collapse, discipline, and transformation — are used as ready-made skeletons onto which the specifics of a given domain are mapped. Where inductive scenario methods build narratives bottom-up from combinations of driving forces, the archetype method starts top-down from Jim Dator's empirically distilled typology of generic futures and asks what each archetype would look like for this particular question. Bishop, Hines and Collins, in their 2007 review of scenario techniques, classify this as one of the principal scenario-development families, valued because the archetypes guarantee a divergent, comprehensible set without the combinatorial explosion of fully inductive methods. The output is a small, contrasting suite of scenarios that share a common, recognizable logic.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Dator, J. (2009). Alternative futures at the Manoa School. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(2), 1-18. link ↗
- Bishop, P., Hines, A., & Collins, T. (2007). The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight, 9(1), 5-25. DOI: 10.1108/14636680710727516 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Dator's Four Futures Archetypes (Archetype-Based Scenario Construction). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/futures-foresight-studies/dator-scenario-archetypes
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Causal Layered AnalysisFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比較
- Intuitive Logics Scenario PlanningFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比較
- Manoa Alternative Futures MethodFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比較
- Three Horizons FrameworkFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比較