ScholarGate
アシスタント
Process / pipelineCliometrics / new economic history

Cliometric Counterfactual Analysis

Cliometric counterfactual analysis is the signature technique of the 'new economic history' pioneered by Robert Fogel: it tests claims about the historical importance of an innovation, institution, or event by constructing an explicit, quantified hypothetical economy in which that factor is absent and measuring how much worse off the counterfactual world would have been. Fogel's 1964 study of American railroads asked not whether railroads mattered but how much, building a hypothetical 1890 economy served by canals and wagons and computing the 'social saving' railroads provided. The shockingly small figure overturned the consensus that railroads were indispensable to American growth, and Fogel and Engerman extended the same explicit, theory-driven, measurement-heavy reasoning to slavery in Time on the Cross. The method fuses neoclassical economic theory, formal counterfactuals, and aggressive quantification of the archival record.

MethodMindで開く近日公開適用、比較、ガイダンスの取得
ツールとリソース
スライドをダウンロード
学習と探索
動画近日公開

手法の全文を読む

会員限定

無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。

ログイン

手法マップ

関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。

出典

  1. Fogel, R. W. (1964). Railroads and American Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History. Johns Hopkins Press. ISBN: 9780801805547
  2. Fogel, R. W., & Engerman, S. L. (1974). Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery. Little, Brown. ISBN: 9780393312188

このページの引用方法

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Cliometric Counterfactual Analysis (Econometric History with Hypothetical Alternatives). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/economic-history/cliometric-counterfactual-analysis

どの手法を選ぶ?

この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。

並べて比較する
ScholarGateCliometric Counterfactual Analysis (Cliometric Counterfactual Analysis (Econometric History with Hypothetical Alternatives)). 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/economic-history/cliometric-counterfactual-analysis · データセット: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026