ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Wright Map Analysis×Learning Progressions Analysis×
分野EducationEducation
系統Latent structureProcess / pipeline
提唱年20052009
提唱者Benjamin Wright (Rasch measurement); construct-mapping framing by Mark WilsonScience and mathematics education research (Corcoran, Mosher, Rogat; Wilson; Clements & Sarama)
種類Graphical display aligning person abilities and item difficulties on one scaleEmpirically grounded ordered description of how understanding develops over time
原典Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 9780805847857Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-Based Approach to Reform (CPRE Research Report RR-63). Consortium for Policy Research in Education. link ↗
別名Item-Person Map, Item Map, Construct Map (Rasch), Variable MapLearning Trajectories, Progress Variables, Learning Progression Validation, Construct Maps
関連44
概要A Wright map (item-person map) is the signature graphical output of Rasch measurement: it places persons and items on the same vertical scale, with examinee abilities on one side and item difficulties on the other, both in logits. Because a person succeeds on an item with probability one-half when their ability equals the item's difficulty, this shared scaling lets analysts see at a glance how well a test is targeted to its examinees, what the items reveal about the construct's order, and where measurement is sparse. Named for Benjamin Wright and central to Mark Wilson's construct-mapping approach, it is a primary tool for interpreting and validating measures.Learning progressions analysis is a methodology for describing and validating the typical paths by which students' understanding of a core concept grows more sophisticated over time. A learning progression hypothesizes an ordered sequence of increasingly advanced ways of thinking — from naive ideas to expert understanding — and then tests that ordering against evidence of how students actually reason. Prominent in science and mathematics education, it links a theory of the domain, the design of assessment tasks, and a measurement model into a coherent description of conceptual development.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Wright Map Analysis · Learning Progressions Analysis. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare